SC Refuses To Stay Patna HC Order Striking Down 65% Reservation in Bihar
SC Refuses To Stay Patna HC Order Striking Down 65% Reservation in Bihar
In its June 20 verdict, the high court had ruled that the amendments, passed unanimously by the state's bicameral legislature in November last year, were "ultra vires" of the Constitution

The Supreme Court on Monday refused to stay Patna High Court order that set aside the increase in reservation for Backward Classes, SC & ST from 50 per cent to 65 per cent in public employment and admission to educational institutions.

A bench of Chief Justice D Y Chandrachud and justices J B Pardiwla and Manoj Misra, however, agreed to hear at least 10 petitions of the Bihar government against the Patna HC verdict. The top court, which did not even issue notices on the pleas, granted leave for appeal and said the petitions will be heard in September.

Appearing for the state government, senior advocate Shyam Divan urged the bench to stay the HC order. He referred to a similar case of Chhattisgarh and said that the top court had then stayed the order of the high court.

“We will list the matter, but we will not grant any stay (on the HC verdict),” the CJI-led bench said.

In its June 20 verdict, the high court had ruled that the amendments, passed unanimously by the state’s bicameral legislature in November last year, were “ultra vires” of the Constitution, “bad in law” and “violative of the equality clause”.

The high court had made it clear that it saw “no extenuating circumstance enabling the state to breach” the 50% cap on reservations laid down by the Supreme Court in the Indra Sawhney case.

(With inputs from agencies)

What's your reaction?

Comments

https://ugara.net/assets/images/user-avatar-s.jpg

0 comment

Write the first comment for this!