Delhi gangrape: SC allows juvenile board to pass order
Delhi gangrape: SC allows juvenile board to pass order
The apex court will hear a plea that juveniles should be treated as an adult if they are commit a heinous crime.

New Delhi: The Supreme Court on Thursday directed the Juvenile Justice Board to go ahead with its proceedings on the minor in the December 16, 2012 gangrape-murder case of a paramedical student and pass an order.

The apex court has also agreed to hear Subramnian Swamy's petition which says that a juvenile should be treated as an adult if he is involved in a heinous crime.

Meanwhile, a special court will start hearing the final arguments later on Thursday in the case which led to the death of a 23-year-old paramedical student. The Delhi Court had earlier allowed the accused to produce two more witnesses in their defence.

The special court trying four adult accused on Wednesday concluded recording of the evidence and would hear final arguments from Thursday.

Additional Sessions Judge Yogesh Khanna fixed August 22 to start final arguments after the statements of the defence witnesses on behalf of accused Vinay Sharma, Akshay Thakur, Pawan Gupta and Mukesh were recorded. "... the defence evidence on behalf of all accused stands closed. The final arguments will start on Thursday. The prosecution shall begin first," the court said.

Vinay in his statements had claimed that on December 16, he had gone to a music event organised by the Church in the DDA district park at Hauz Khas in south Delhi and co-accused Pawan was also present there. However, the accused's claim was rejected by the prosecution witnesses. The same was the plea of Akshay who had said that he was not in the bus and had left for his village in Bihar, a day prior to the incident.

Mukesh, during his deposition, had said he was driving the bus in which the girl was sexually assaulted and her male friend was brutally attacked by his brother Ram Singh, Vinay, Pawan, Akshay and the juvenile. However, the other three had refuted Mukesh's submissions before the judge and had claimed innocence saying they were not in the bus. The court concluded recording of evidence on behalf of the prosecution and the accused in a total of 117 effective hearings.

According to the prosecution, Ram Singh, Vinay, Akshay, Pawan and Mukesh had allegedly gangraped the girl in a moving bus after alluring her and a 28-year-old male friend who was assaulted with a iron rod. The victim's friend, a software engineer, got fracture during the scuffle but the girl died of her injuries on December 29, 2012 while undergoing treatment in a Singapore hospital. During the trial, Ram Singh was found dead in Tihar Jail on March 11 and court proceedings against him stand abated.

The sixth accused, a juvenile, is facing inquiry before the juvenile justice board in Delhi. In the case, the prosecution has examined 85 witnesses to prove its case against the four adult accused. The accused have brought 17 defence witnesses to strengthen their plea of alibi. On Wednesday, the last defence witness on behalf of Vinay, a coconut water seller deposed in the court that on the incident night there was a music function at the DDA district park and Vinay had gone there with his parents and friends.

However, Special Public Prosecutor Dayan Krishnan said the witness is deposing falsely at the behest of the accused's parents. He further told the judge that Vinay was present in the bus along with other five co-accused including the juvenile. "During this period, the accused committed robbery with one Ramadhar and thereafter they induced the victim and her male friend to board the bus.

"Later, they all robbed the two and also gangraped and inflicited injury on the body of the victim which resulted in her death," the prosecution claimed. A P Singh and Vivek Sharma, the counsel for Vinay, Akshay and Pawan refuted the prosecution's claim and said the accused have been falsely implicated.

(With additional inputs from PTI)

What's your reaction?

Comments

https://ugara.net/assets/images/user-avatar-s.jpg

0 comment

Write the first comment for this!