Opinion | Is Yasin Malik a Friend or Foe of Kashmir?
Opinion | Is Yasin Malik a Friend or Foe of Kashmir?
Right up to 1994, JKLF remained a ‘militant’ organisation, allowed to set up its branches in every major town of the UK, and openly raise money for carrying out subversive activities in Kashmir

United Kingdom’s Minister of State for Foreign, Commonwealth and Development Affairs, Lord Tariq Ahmad, told the House of Lords (Upper House) in London that the British government was monitoring the trial of Yasin Malik (who once was the leader of the banned terrorist organisation Jammu Kashmir Liberation Front or JKLF) very closely.

Why is it that the UK government is meddling in India’s internal judicial affairs regarding Yasin Malik who has already accepted all charges brought up against him?

First, it was the British who orchestrated the attack on the independent state of Jammu and Kashmir on October 22, 1947. This attack was conducted by the Pakistan Army and mercenary tribal lashkars who were acting under the direct command of then (British) Commander in Chief of the Pakistan army, General Sir Walter Messervy (15 August, 1947 to 10 February 1948).

The aim was to capture Jammu and Kashmir and forcefully annex it with the dominion of Pakistan. The purpose was to deny India land access to Central Asia, most of which at the time was part of the now former Soviet Union. The Maharaja of Jammu and Kashmir Hari Singh signed an Instrument of Accession with India on October 26, 1947, making Jammu and Kashmir an integral part of the newly established Republic of India. Only then Indian troops began to arrive at Srinagar airport and push the invading Pakistan Army back.

The scope of this article is too narrow for me to delve into the nitty-gritty of why Jawaharlal Nehru approached the United Nations Security Council and asked for a ceasefire agreement especially when we were winning the war.

However, it is important to understand that at the time the British were wary of the Soviet influence spreading into India and second, and perhaps more importantly, they wanted to control the trade route to Central Asia. Since the first Kashmir war (1947-1949), western parts of the Jammu province and parts of Kashmir like Muzaffarabad remain under Pakistani occupation. A separatist movement was artificially created with the aid of the Pakistan military and its ace spy agency the Inter-Services Intelligence (ISI) to provoke the Kashmiri Muslim population to rise in a popular revolt. This popular revolt never took place.

Amanullah Khan, who was a protégé of the ISI, had created Jammu Kashmir Liberation front in Birmingham, England on May 29, 1977. Therefore the British connection in relation to the formation of an anti-India terrorist organisation cannot be ruled out.

Right up to 1994, JKLF remained a ‘militant’ (read terrorist) organisation, which was allowed to set up its branches in every major town of the UK, and openly raise money for carrying out subversive activities in Kashmir. Since its inception, JKLF has been involved in planning and execution of hijackings, planting bombs and kidnappings. It was in the city of Birmingham that Indian diplomat Ravindra Mhatre was kidnapped and later murdered by the militant wing of JKLF who were demanding the release of terrorist Maqbool Bhat from the Tihar Jail in Delhi.

In 1990, the Pakistan Army decided to use the jihadists returning from Afghanistan for ‘Kashmir Jihad’. It was at this point in history that a deadly confrontation between the mujahideen and JKLF goons kicked off. The aim was to gain and maintain political hegemony over ‘Kashmir Jihad’. JKLF stood no chance during the fight against ISI-backed and Afghan jihad battle-hardened mujahideen who began target-killing JKLF militants.

At this point Yasin Malik announced (1994) that JKLF would lay down the gun. Malik said JKLF would join the peaceful ‘political’ (read anti-India separatist) process. Charges against Yasin Malik include those under Unlawful Activities (Prevention) Act (UAPA) among others. When the charges were read out to Malik he told the court that he would not contest the charges.

Malik is charged with being a member of a terrorist organisation, conspiracy to commit terrorism, raising funds for terrorist act under UAPA and Sections 120-B (criminal conspiracy) and 124-A (sedition) of the Indian Penal code.

Malik is among 18 people being tried under these charges and he is not even the main accused. The main high profile offenders charged with these offences are the chief of Lashkar-e-Taiba Hafiz Saeed and the chief of Hizbul Mujahideen Syed Salahuddin, both of whom are responsible for conducting numerous terrorist acts in the Valley of Kashmir, including January 19, 1990 genocide of the indigenous Kashmiri Pandits in which JKLF as an organisation and Yasin Malik as its leader took part in the murder and rape of Kashmiri men and women. Yasin Malik and the likes of him are no friends of the people of Kashmir. They are criminals of the worst order and should be treated as such.

It would be sensible for the foreign minister of the UK to look in his own backyard and worry about the thousands of jihadists of Pakistani origin busy converting the English boroughs and towns such as Newham, Tower Hamlets, Birmingham, Bradford, Manchester, Luton into Islamic towns where Sharia courts might soon supersede the British Crown Court.

Dr Amjad Ayub Mirza is an author and a human rights activist from Mirpur in PoJK. He currently lives in exile in the UK. The views expressed in this article are those of the author and do not represent the stand of this publication.

Read all the Latest Opinions here

What's your reaction?

Comments

https://ugara.net/assets/images/user-avatar-s.jpg

0 comment

Write the first comment for this!