‘It’s Political Parties’ Right to Protest’: Madras HC on DMK's Signature Campaign Opposing NEET
‘It’s Political Parties’ Right to Protest’: Madras HC on DMK's Signature Campaign Opposing NEET
The petitioner raised concerns about the ruling DMK taking advantage of its position by engaging in political activities within schools without obtaining parental consent

The Madras High Court on Thursday dismissed as withdrawn a petition filed by advocate ML Ravi against a signature campaign ‘NEET Vilaku, Nam llakku’ (Our Goal is to Abolish NEET) initiated by the Dravida Munnetra Kazhagam (DMK) party.

The campaign was launched by Tamil Nadu’s sports and youth development minister, Udayanidhi Stalin, with the aim of collecting 50 lakh signatures in 50 days to advocate for the abolition of NEET. The collected signatures will be presented to President Draupadi Murmu.

It was the contention of the petitioner that NEET had already been established and implemented, and the legal challenges against it had concluded.

He argued that a minister, acting as an implementing authority, should not endorse protests against a law that is already in place. While the Constitution grants every individual the right to protest, a minister is expected to uphold the Constitution and the law, he contended.

Moreover, he raised concerns about the ruling DMK taking advantage of its position by engaging in political activities within schools without obtaining parental consent.

Such campaigns might adversely affect students’ motivation to prepare for NEET, potentially leading to missed opportunities, the petitioner submitted.

However, while hearing the petition, a division bench of Chief Justice SV Gangapurwala and Justice D Bharatha Chakravarthy questioned how the advocate was personally affected by a political party’s campaign.

It is political parties’ right to engage in protest activities as long as they do not contravene public policy, the bench said.

The court then ordered Ravi to deposit a sum of Rs 1 lakh, following which Ravi sought leave to withdraw his petition. The court acceded to the same and dismissed the plea as withdrawn.

What's your reaction?

Comments

https://ugara.net/assets/images/user-avatar-s.jpg

0 comment

Write the first comment for this!